In partnership with
Where to Invest $100,000 Right Now, According to Experts
Investors face a dilemma. When the S&P 500 finished its worst quarter since 2022 last month, diversifiers like bonds and bitcoin fell too.
Even with the turnaround in mid-April, analysts at Goldman Sachs and Vanguard have projected low-single-digit annualized returns from 2024-2034.
Bloomberg asked where experts would personally invest $100,000 for their March monthly edition.
One answer that surfaced for a second time? Art.
It's what billionaires like Bezos and the Rockefellers have privately used to diversify for decades.
Why?
Appreciation. The ArtPrice100 Index outpaced the S&P 500 overall from 2000 to 2025
Low-correlation. The postwar contemporary segment has moved independently of traditional investments like stocks since ‘95.*
Resilience. A scarce, physical, and global asset class with decades of demonstrated demand.
Thanks to the world's premier art investing platform, now anyone can invest in works featuring legends like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso, without needing millions.
Shares in new offerings can sell quickly but...
*According to Masterworks data. Investing involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. See important Reg A disclosures at masterworks.com/cd.
Date: 11th June, 2026
Rajneeti Heist?: BJP Turns A 2-1 Contest Into A 3-0 Sweep
The Fact: The Congress has alleged ‘seat chori’ by the BJP in the upcoming Rajya Sabha polls. This comes after the nomination of a Congress candidate from MP was cancelled on the BJP’s complaint. The Returning Officer rejected Congress candidate Meenakshi Natarajan’s nomination for allegedly hiding a ‘case against her’ in her affidavit. With this, the BJP’s candidate gets elected unopposed on the seat.
The Context: Elections to Rajya Sabha seats from MP are going to be held on June 18. In Rajya Sabha elections, MLAs from each state form the electoral college. Based of Madhya Pradesh’s assembly strength, each candidate needs to get 57 first-preference votes to be elected, i.e., at least 57 MLAs should choose a candidate as their first-preference. And going by the current numbers, the BJP had enough MLAs to comfortably win two seats. The Congress, on the other hand, could have only secured one seat. The expected outcome was BJP 2 and Congress 1. But once the BJP fielded a third candidate ahead of the scheduled elections, the Congress feared cross-voting. It tried shifting its MLAs to Karnataka to prevent any poaching attempts, but that went to vain when Mahesh Kewat filled the complaint against Natrajan. The Congress argues that the cases cited against Natrajan did not meet the disclosure threshold prescribed under election rules. Therefore, it should not have resulted in her disqualification because she had nothing to disclose. What further adds to this controversy is the parallel case of BJP-backed independent candidate Parimal Nathwani in Jharkhand. He faced similar questions regarding procedural discrepancies in his nomination papers. However, he was allowed additional time to correct them.
The Peek Insight: This controversy comes at a sensitive political moment. There have already been allegations of BJP acting in cahoots with the Election Commission. Opposition parties have repeatedly argued that central institutions such as the EC and the ED are being used as political tools to target rivals and reshape the political landscape. Recent political developments make critics wonder if the BJP is pursuing a strategy that goes beyond defeating opposition parties electorally. Is the objective to gradually weaken regional parties, empowering rebel factions, and altering the balance of power through institutional mechanisms? From AAP and TMC MPs switching to the NDA to allegations of electoral manipulation, is the NDA - cut to size in 2024 - now trying to just increase its Parliament numbers by hook or by crook?
The Great Political Migration: As Opposition Leaders Drift, The NDA Grows
The Fact: A series of political developments over the past week have strengthened the BJP-led NDA's position in Parliament. In West Bengal, senior MP Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar claimed that 20 Trinamool Congress MPs had written to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla expressing their desire to support the NDA, bringing internal dissent within the party into the open. Separately, Rajya Sabha MP Sushmita Dev resigned from the TMC, triggering speculation about her future political alignment with the BJP. Meanwhile, in Madhya Pradesh, the BJP is set to secure all three Rajya Sabha seats after the nomination of Congress candidate Meenakshi Natarajan was rejected, a result that altered what was initially expected to be a 2-1 split between the BJP and the Congress. The developments come months after several AAP MPs led by Raghav Chadha merged with the BJP, adding to the ruling alliance's parliamentary strength.
The Context: The BJP returned to power in 2024 but fell short of a majority on its own, making it more dependent on coalition partners than during its previous two terms. Since then, the NDA has steadily worked to consolidate its position in Parliament, both through electoral victories and by attracting leaders from opposition parties. The latest developments in West Bengal are particularly significant because they follow the TMC's setback in the state's Assembly elections. The rebellion within the party suggests that the electoral defeat has triggered a wider leadership and organisational crisis. At the national level, opposition parties have repeatedly accused the BJP of using its political dominance to engineer defections, while the BJP maintains that leaders are joining the NDA because they see greater political alignment and stability within the ruling alliance. For the NDA, every additional MP matters. A stronger presence in both Houses of Parliament reduces dependence on allies, improves legislative flexibility, and helps the government navigate contentious bills with greater ease.
The Peek Insight: Viewed individually, defections are routine features of Indian politics. Viewed together, however, these developments point to a broader political strategy of the NDA's effort to strengthen its parliamentary position after the more competitive verdict of 2024. The BJP emerged as the single largest party in the Lok Sabha but lost the outright dominance it enjoyed in 2014 and 2019. Since then, the alliance appears to have focused on rebuilding political cushion, not through elections alone, but through attracting opposition leaders and expanding its footprint within Parliament. The question is why so many opposition parties appear unable to retain their own ranks. From Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh to West Bengal and Delhi, rivals have repeatedly accused the BJP of engineering defections, encouraging splits within parties and using its political dominance to expand its footprint beyond what election results alone delivered. Politicians who once fiercely criticised the BJP often find themselves sharing political space with it when circumstances change. For the opposition, the challenge is larger than individual defections. A parliamentary democracy functions best when the ruling alliance faces a credible and organised counterweight. If opposition parties continue to lose leaders, lawmakers and organisational strength, the imbalance in India's political landscape could grow even wider.
The Fine-Print Of History: Modi Is Now India’s Longest-Serving PM, But Only If You Start The Clock In 1952
The Fact: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on June 10 became India's longest-serving elected Prime Minister in terms of continuous tenure after democratic elections, completing 4,399 uninterrupted days in office since first assuming charge on May 26, 2014. The milestone was marked at the NDA meeting in New Delhi, where alliance partners passed a resolution congratulating Modi on completing 12 consecutive years as Prime Minister. Messages of congratulations also came from several foreign leaders, including US President Trump, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim among others.
The Context: Modi's achievement is often contrasted with the tenure of Jawaharlal Nehru, who served as Prime Minister from August 15, 1947, until his death on May 27, 1964. While Nehru remains India's longest-serving Prime Minister overall, Modi has surpassed Nehru's elected tenure record because India's first general election was held only in 1951-52. Nehru's period as Prime Minister before that was not based on a direct electoral mandate under the Constitution. The distinction has become central to the BJP's political messaging. Since securing successive mandates in 2014, 2019 and 2024, Modi has emerged as the dominant figure in national politics, presiding over major policy interventions such as demonetisation, the Goods and Services Tax (GST), the abrogation of Article 370, the expansion of welfare delivery through digital platforms, and the rapid rise of UPI-based transactions. These measures have helped define the Modi era, even their long-term economic and social impact is debatable.
The Peek Insight: Few leaders in independent India have exercised comparable electoral dominance across three consecutive Lok Sabha elections or remained as central to public debate for such an extended period. Yet longevity in office has also brought heightened scrutiny. Questions around institutional autonomy, media freedom, executive centralisation, unemployment, inflation, and the government's handling of contentious issues such as the Manipur violence remain at the centre of political debate. Critics have also pointed to the Prime Minister not conducting a single press conference, while the government argues that its record should be judged by outcomes ranging from infrastructure expansion and welfare delivery to India's growing global profile. The milestone also underscores a larger political contest over legacy. The BJP's emphasis on Modi's record reflects its broader effort to redefine post-Independence political benchmarks long associated with Nehru. Whether Modi eventually surpasses Nehru's overall tenure record will depend on future electoral verdicts. More immediately, the challenge before his government is to convert political longevity into answers for the economic and governance questions that continue to dominate public discourse.
Beyond The Punchline: No Means No, Even After Biryani
The Fact: A stand-up comedy show by comedian Pranit More sparked widespread criticism after a clip from an audience interaction segment went viral online. In the video, a man claimed that because he had spent ₹370 on a biryani during a date, he expected to "recover" that amount through physical intimacy. He then went on to describe how he persuaded his date to become physical with him. The video showed audience members laughing and cheering. More responded by calling it "Peak Gurgaon content" and awarded the man a cash prize. As the clip drew backlash online, the man, identified as Himanshu Jangra, was reportedly terminated by his employer. The comedian later issued an apology, describing his response as a lapse in judgment and stating that he did not endorse the views expressed on stage. He subsequently deactivated his Instagram account amid mounting criticism, with creators such as Kusha Kapila and Dolly Singh among those publicly condemning the incident.
The Context: What began as a controversial moment from a comedy show has since evolved into a larger conversation about consent, dating culture, and the way women are viewed in relationships. Critics argued that the man's remarks reflected a transactional mindset, the belief that spending money on a woman creates an obligation on her part. Such a view is fundamentally incompatible with the idea of freely given consent. The backlash also comes at a time when comedians and content creators are facing increasing scrutiny over jokes that are seen as crossing the line from provocative to insensitive. In this case, much of the criticism was directed not only at the audience member's comments but also at the enthusiastic reaction they received from both the crowd and the performer. For many, the controversy highlighted how certain attitudes towards women can still be normalised, even when presented as humour.
The Peek Insight: For years, large parts of Indian comedy, whether on television, stand-up stages, or social media, have often relied on jokes about women's appearance, bodies, sexuality, and even autonomy. Popular comedy shows have routinely mined laughs from stereotypes about wives, girlfriends, mothers-in-law, and women's looks. The result is a culture where jokes that reduce women to objects of ridicule or transaction are often dismissed as harmless fun. The controversy has also reopened a broader conversation about where comedy draws the line. Whether it was the controversy around comments involving parents on a popular YouTube show or criticism of jokes targeting people with disabilities, the question is where does irreverence end and insensitivity begin? Comedy has always pushed boundaries. Some of the world's most celebrated comedians have built careers on challenging social norms and offending conventional wisdom. But in many mature comedy cultures, the distinction often lies in punching up rather than punching down, targeting those in power rather than reinforcing prejudices against groups that already face discrimination. The strongest comedy provokes thought without normalising harmful attitudes. The question, therefore, is not whether comedians should be allowed to offend. They should. The real question is what kind of behaviour audiences choose to reward. If a joke built around the idea that a woman "owes" a man intimacy because he paid for a meal can draw applause, it points to a problem that extends far beyond a comedy club. It reflects the persistence of attitudes that continue to treat consent, dignity, and women's autonomy as negotiable rather than non-negotiable.
The Fast Track Through The Himalayas: India’s Longest Road Tunnel Reaches Its Final Breakthrough
The Fact: The Zojila Tunnel project crossed a major milestone on June 9 with the completion of its final excavation breakthrough, connecting both ends of the tunnel beneath the Zojila Pass. The breakthrough was marked by Union Minister Nitin Gadkari triggering the final blast. At 13.15 km in length and located at an altitude of over 11,500 feet, the tunnel is set to become one of the world's longest bi-directional road tunnels at such a high altitude. Built at a cost of around ₹6,800 crore, the project is being executed by Megha Engineering and Infrastructures Ltd. It reduces the travel time from Ganderbal (in Jammu and Kashmir) to Kargil from around three hours to over 15 minutes
The Context: The Zojila Pass on the Srinagar-Kargil-Leh highway has long been the only surface link connecting Ladakh with the Kashmir Valley. Every winter, heavy snowfall forces the closure of the pass for several months, disrupting the movement of people, goods and essential supplies. The tunnel is expected to change that by providing all-weather connectivity between the two regions. Beyond civilian transport, the project holds strategic importance. Ladakh borders both China and Pakistan, making reliable connectivity a key requirement for military logistics and troop movement. The tunnel is part of a broader push to strengthen transport infrastructure in border regions, alongside a series of roads, bridges and tunnels being developed across the Himalayas.
The Peek Insight: The significance of the Zojila Tunnel lies in what it represents for a region long defined by difficult terrain and seasonal isolation. For decades, weather dictated connectivity between Kashmir and Ladakh. The tunnel seeks to reverse that equation by making access less dependent on the harsh conditions of the high Himalayas.For residents, this could mean more reliable access to healthcare, education, markets and government services. For businesses, it promises smoother movement of goods and greater predictability in supply chains. The tourism sector, a key source of livelihoods in Ladakh, could also benefit from improved year-round accessibility. Strategically, the project is expected to strengthen India's ability to maintain uninterrupted connectivity to Ladakh, particularly during winter months when mobility has traditionally been constrained.
And finally,
Indian news needs a new mainstream
We’ve all seen it enough: TV debates chasing noise, newspapers weighed down with complexity, and social media flooded with misinformation. But none of that means you should be left confused, misled, or disconnected from the truth.
Join us in building a space where clarity cuts through chaos, and the truth comes above all numbers!