In partnership with

Investors see ANOTHER return from Masterworks (!!!!)

That’s 6 sales in 7 months. 29 all time. And the performance?

16.5%, 17.6%, and 17.8%, net annualized returns on sold works held longer than one year (See all 29 at Masterworks.com)

It’s not from stocks, private equity, or real estate… it’s from contemporary and post war art. Crazy, right?

With Masterworks, you don’t need to be a BILLIONAIRE to invest in multi-million dollar art anymore.

Historically, the segment overall has had attractive appreciation and low correlation to stocks.*

Masterworks targets works featuring legends like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso, identifying what they believe to have significant long-term appreciation potential, not just at the artist level but at the level of individual artworks.

As one of the largest players in the art market, with $1.3 billion invested over 500 artworks, they pass critical advantages through to their 70,000+ members to add art to their portfolios strategically.

Looking to diversify your investments in 2026?

*According to Masterworks data. Investing involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. See important Reg A disclosures at masterworks.com/cd.

Date: 23rd May, 2026

The Bug Stops Here: Government’s Bizarre National Security ‘Pest Control’ On Satire Page?

The Fact: The central government has blocked the X account of the Cockroach Janta Party, the viral Gen Z sensation that has taken over Indian social media. The party’s Instagram handle, which has gained 20 million followers in 5 days, is also likely to be blocked soon, a government official told the Indian Express. The account was taken down after the Intelligence Bureau (IB) flagged it as a ‘threat to national security and India's sovereignty’.

The Context: The account was allegedly distributing "inflammatory content" capable of jeopardising public order, according to the Indian Express report. Speaking against the move, CJP founder Abhijit Dipke said, "People are frustrated because they don't feel heard or represented. Gen Z has given up on traditional political parties and wants to create its own political front in a language they understand. The CJP’s Instagram account achieved an unprecedented level of digital growth, accumulating over 2 crore (20 million) followers within just five days of its creation. It surpassed the combined online follower counts of India's largest traditional political entities, the BJP and Congress. Its main demands include the resignation of the Education Minister over the NEET paper leak, and 50% reservation for women at the current Lok Sabha strength and the cabinet. The party also filed a petition for Pradhan’s resignation, which gained 1 lakh signatures in an hour.

The Peek Insight: The takedown of the Cockroach Janata Party’s account points to massive government overreach. While the movement’s meteoric social media rise has sparked many conversations, it is unclear as to how it is a threat to national security. Further, why is ‘traction among the youth’ particularly concerning for the Intelligence Bureau? The party hasn’t even issued a ‘call to action’ or an appeal for mobilisation to its followers. In that case, is a simple social media page critical of the government a threat to India’s sovereignty? While comparisons to similar online congregations that led to Gen Z protests in Nepal would be far-fetched and inaccurate, critics say the government fears an umbrella organisation rallying the youth of the country on issues that make the powers uncomfortable. With the takedown, the government has proven exactly why millions of young Indian citizens united in an unprecedented social media movement. They desperately need an outlet for resistance amid the increasingly shrinking space for dissent and questioning.

‘Cream’ Rises To The Top, Quota Stays At The Bottom?: SC Spots The ‘Paradox’

Image Courtesy: Live Law

The Fact: A Supreme Court bench of Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan questioned whether children of families that had achieved educational and economic advancement through reservation should continue to avail OBC reservation benefits. The observations arose while hearing a petition against a Karnataka High Court judgment in the case of a Kuruba community candidate selected as an Assistant Engineer under the reserved category.

The Context: The District Caste and Income Verification Committee had denied him a caste validity certificate, concluding that he fell within the creamy layer, as the family's combined annual income was assessed at approximately ₹19.48 lakh, with both parents employed as state government servants. The petitioner's counsel, Advocate Shashank Ratnoo, argued that salary income was not the determining criterion for creamy layer exclusion among government servants, and that only income from business or other non-salary sources ought to be considered. He contended that a Karnataka government clarification specifically excluded salary and allowances from the creamy layer assessment for state government employees. The Karnataka High Court's Division Bench had, however, held that the 1993 Central Government Office Memorandum excluding salary income applied only to Union Government reservations and not to Karnataka's reservation policy 

The Peek Insight: Justice Nagarathna's pointed observation that families should eventually graduate out of the reservation placed a long-deferred question squarely before the judiciary. The creamy layer principle exists precisely to prevent intergenerational capture of a policy designed for the historically disadvantaged. When two IAS officers' children claim a reservation, the beneficiary is no longer the community the policy was meant to uplift. But the mere framing of the question signals an institutional willingness to examine what India's reservation architecture has long avoided confronting: whether entitlement, once inherited, ever expires. 

The Paper Trail Of Denial: NEET Leak Big Enough To Investigate, Small Enough To Admit?

Image Courtesy: The Wire

The Fact: The National Testing Agency told a Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education that the NEET UG re-examination was not a case of a paper "leak," but of irregularities and malpractices that came to light. NTA Director General Abhishek Singh stated that the leak did not originate from within their system, and that the CBI report was awaited to reveal the gaps. The CBI registered the case on May 12 following a written complaint from the Department of Higher Education. So far, nine accused have been arrested, with investigators alleging that around 42 mock test questions matched the actual exam held on May 3. 

The Context: A 100% match between leaked Chemistry questions and the actual NEET UG 2026 paper led the NTA to suspect an insider leak, prompting the agency to share details of around 27 paper setters and translators with the CBI. Key accused PV Kulkarni, a Chemistry lecturer with access to the NEET question papers, allegedly shared questions with students ahead of the exam. Searches at a coaching institute's premises led to the recovery of a Chemistry question bank that allegedly contained the exact same questions that appeared in the NEET UG exam.

The Peek Insight: The NTA's claim before Parliament, that questions merely "went out" rather than were "leaked"  is a distinction without a difference. When investigators have arrested ten people, recovered the paper on suspects' phones, and confirmed a 100% question match, semantic gymnastics do not hold. The NTA administered a test whose integrity was already compromised before students entered exam halls. Calling that anything other than a leak is not a legal position; it is an accountability evasion. For 22 lakh students whose futures hinge on this exam, the label matters far less than the failure it represents.

Blurred Copies, Broken Trust: CBSE Plays Hide And Seek With Students’ Futures

The Fact: CBSE’s On-Screen Marking (OSM) system, where teachers evaluate digitally-scanned answer sheets as opposed to physical ones, has come under criticism after Class 12 students reported blurred answer sheets, portal crashes, and difficulties accessing the re-evaluation website. Many students claimed that the uploaded copies were unreadable, which raised concerns over whether evaluators could properly assess answers through the digital system. Social media has since been flooded with screenshots of unclear PDFs and complaints about failed logins, payment errors, and inaccessible rechecking links. The CBSE has denied any “major glitches.”

The Context: CBSE has been shifting towards digital ways of evaluation to adopt modern examination practices and reduce human bias. Hence, the OSM system was introduced to improve efficiency and speed in checking answer sheets. However, there have been recent complaints regarding growing concerns about transparency and accountability in board examinations. The issue is incredibly sensitive because Class 12 scores remain crucial for university admissions and competitive examinations like the CUET, where even minor discrepancies can influence academic futures. The backlash also arose due to broader national conversations about examination stress, technical failures, and trust in digital governance systems within Indian education.

The Peek Insight: The OSM controversy is not just about blurred answer sheets or a malfunctioning portal. Digitisation does help make work faster and more efficient. However, students feel that these systems are being introduced too quickly without being properly tested in real situations. The controversy shows how technical problems in education can quickly turn into issues of trust, especially when students’ marks affect their future opportunities. CBSE may want to improve its digital system and also the way it maintains transparency and student confidence in an increasingly technology-based education system.

Image Courtesy: NDTV

Is Meta’s Data Hunger Leaving Georgia Thirsty?

The Fact: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Member of the US House of Representatives, came to a Congressional hearing with two bottles of brown, contaminated drinking water, which she said are from a Georgia village. She said that Meta data centres are affecting water quality and availability in rural Georgia. Responding to the comments, an Environmental Protection Agency official said, ‘We will be looking into exactly what you’ve just talked about, because anywhere, whatever type of construction it is, it is a priority to ensure the water quality standards established by EPA are being met’. Meta denied the allegations, with a spokesperson stating, “When concerns were raised in Stanton Springs, we commissioned an independent groundwater study, which found that our data center operations and construction had no impact on the residents.”

The Context: While Meta denied the allegations, Congresswoman AOC categorically said that the only change in that Georgia locality she visited that could’ve caused groundwater contamination was the construction of a Meta data center. Data Centre construction sites are often a source of sediments, along with heavy metals and hydrocarbons. Without proper instrumentation, these pollutants reach the water taps of local houses, acting as extreme pollutants.

The Peek Insight: This alarm in the US also raises serious concerns in India. India’s operational data centre capacity currently stands at roughly 1.5 GW, concentrated heavily in Mumbai/Navi Mumbai, which accounts for nearly half of the country’s installed capacity. Industry projections suggest this capacity could grow several-fold by 2030, driven by AI adoption, cloud demand, and data localization policies, though estimates vary widely from 4 GW to as high as 10 GW. India’s next wave of data-centre expansion is planned in Visakhapatnam, Hyderabad, Chennai, Noida, Bengaluru, and the Mumbai–Navi Mumbai corridor. The biggest upcoming project is a one-gigawatt Google data center in Andhra Pradesh’s Visakhapatnam, that’s being built in partnership with Adani. India will have to learn from the US’ mistakes and implement guardrails for data centres well in advance, as such groundwater contamination in India’s densely populated areas could impact lakhs of families.

And finally,

Indian news needs a new mainstream

We’ve all seen it enough: TV debates chasing noise, newspapers weighed down with complexity, and social media flooded with misinformation. But none of that means you should be left confused, misled, or disconnected from the truth.

Join us in building a space where clarity cuts through chaos, and the truth comes above all numbers!

Thank you for reading,

Peek TV

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading