In partnership with
The Last Time Stocks Were This Expensive Was December 1999.
"Right now, it's good. But it was in '72, '86, 2000, and 2007." - Jamie Dimon, May 2026.
The Shiller CAPE ratio just hit 42.3. The only time in 140 years it's been higher? December 1999.
Stocks can stay expensive for a long time...
It’s one metric to consider, but when your portfolio is built around the most expensive equities in modern history, what else you diversify with could really matter.
Blue-chip contemporary and post war art has shown near-zero correlation with the S&P since 1995.* Prices are largely driven by private collectors competing for a fixed supply of artwork by artists like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso.
Masterworks lets you invest in shares of that market.
$1.3B deployed across 500+ artworks
29 exits to date
Net annualized returns like 16.5%, 17.6%, and 17.8%, not including those unsold
*According to Masterworks data. Investing involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. See important Reg A disclosures at masterworks.com/cd.
Date: 10th June, 2026
End Of The Last Woman Standing?: Didi’s Deck Folds, Did BJP Play The Lotus Trump Card?
The Fact: The Trinamool Congress is facing its biggest internal crisis since its formation. After the party's defeat in the West Bengal Assembly election, 58 MLAs reportedly backed expelled leader Ritabrata Banerjee as Leader of Opposition instead of Mamata Banerjee's nominee. The rebellion could spread to the Parliament as well, with claims that 20 of TMC's 28 Lok Sabha MPs have written to Speaker Om Birla, expressing their desire to join the BJP-led NDA.
The Context: The developments in Bengal have drawn comparisons with the Shiv Sena split in Maharashtra, when Uddhav Thackeray lost his party symbol and name to the Shinde-led rebel faction. Critics argue that the Bengal Assembly Speaker's decision to side with rebel TMC MLAs goes against the Supreme Court's view that the political party's leadership, in this case Mamata Banerjee, should prevail over a breakaway legislature group. At the same time, TMC's troubles appear to stem from growing dissatisfaction within the party over Didi’s nephew Abhishek Banerjee's rising influence, centralised decision-making, and a series of controversies surrounding alleged corruption, ‘cut money,’ and political hooliganism that have weakened the party's cohesion.
The Peek Insight: Whether this is another BJP-led "Operation Lotus" or simply the result of TMC's internal contradictions, the episode points to a larger trend. Several regional parties built around powerful leaders, from Arvind Kejriwal and Uddhav Thackeray to Naveen Patnaik and Jagan Mohan Reddy, have faced significant setbacks in recent years. There are serious issues plaguing the regional satraps - from families running the show to local strongmen treating constituencies like personal fiefdoms. Add to that the allegations of corruption that many of these old-guard regional leaders face. In such a scenario, factionalism is bound to rise, and a political juggernaut like the BJP is guaranteed to seize the political opportunity. Whether these defections are engineered splits or the only choice opposition leaders are left with amid fear of agencies is a matter of debate. The fact is that with the coup on Mamata Banerjee’s TMC, one of India’s last few formidable opposition forces may be severely unarmed in the battle against a hegemonic BJP. Didi is the latest in a growing list of opposition leaders who are not even legislators in their own state assemblies. Case in point - Arvind Kejriwal and MK Stalin. When almost all opposition leaders are on the back foot in their home turf, can there be a national challenger to PM Modi’s BJP anytime soon?
Wangchuk Asks Cockroaches To ‘Ant’ Up, Warns Government Of Fast-Unto-Death
The Fact: ‘They should call themselves cockr-ants,’ said eminent educator Sonam Wangchuk in an exclusive interview with Peek TV, adding that ants are hard-working and he doesn’t want the youth to be ‘lazy and unemployed’. Wangchuk, who has now arguably become the most prominent face of the satirical page Cockroach Janata Party (CJP), also said that he would sit on a fast-unto-death if Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan does not resign in the next week or so. Speaking to Peek TV's co-founder, Priyanshi Sharma, Wangchuk praised the CJP's first nationwide protest that was held on June 6th at Jantar Mantar. He commended the participants for being entirely law-abiding and peaceful. But, at the same time, he argued that sometimes peaceful protests can make it easier for governments to ignore public dissent. On those lines, he stated that although he does not favor such methods, he would be ready to sit on a fast unto death if compelled by the government's lack of accountability.
The Context: Sonam Wangchuk is no stranger to hunger strikes. In 2024, he undertook a 21-day fast unto death demanding statehood for Ladakh. A year later, in September, he was detained under the National Security Act (NSA) for six months after a mass agitation around the same demands turned violent. Around four civilians lost their lives. It is against this backdrop that Wangchuk has once again raised the possibility of a fast unto death, this time demanding Pradhan's resignation. The controversy stems from the NEET paper leak, which was taken by nearly 22 lakh students. On May 12, the NTA announced that a re-examination would be held on June 21. Soon after the leak, nearly five students died by suicide. This has become the centre of the cockroach movement and mass demands for the resignation of the Education Minister.
The Peek Insight: Despite a determined support for the CJP, the most striking aspect of Wangchuk's remarks was the caution. The environmental activist reiterated that he would support the movement only if it remains neutral and steers clear of any political alignment. Although he had endorsed the movement concerns on June 6, he stopped short of offering unconditional backing to the satirical page. He suggested that public trust is something that is lacking in India and must be carefully upheld by the founders of the CJP, who have been accused of having links to the Aam Aadmi Party. He also made it clear that he is still gauging the group's leanings, and if in the future the movement takes a political line, he will abandon the forum. At the same time, the environmental activist hinted that the movement may need structural reforms. Drawing a comparison with ants, Wangchuk argued that the CJP should become more organised, disciplined, and harmonised in its functioning like ants and not cockroaches. Wangchuk's remarks suggest that the organisation must be mindful of the trust placed in it by not only its 20+ million Instagram followers but by those who have put their credibility on the line and stood beside it.
Question Quarantine: No Phones, No Internet, 2-Week Lockdown For Paper Setters After NEET Leak
The Fact: In an extraordinary security exercise ahead of the NEET-UG retest scheduled for June 21, the National Testing Agency (NTA) has placed academics involved in setting and translating the question paper under complete isolation at secure, undisclosed locations. According to reports, these experts have been cut off from all forms of external communication, with mobile phones, laptops, smartwatches, and other electronic devices barred from the premises. Access to the facilities is tightly controlled and monitored round the clock. The move comes weeks after the Indian Air Force was deployed to transport examination papers securely to ‘prevent’ any recurrence of paper leaks after the first-ever nationwide NEET re-exam due to a leak.
The Context: The unprecedented lockdown of paper setters follows the controversy surrounding the original NEET-UG examination conducted in May, which was subsequently cancelled amid a paper leak. Investigations revealed that individuals entrusted with the examination process allegedly exploited their access to confidential material, leading to serious concerns about the integrity of the system. The episode triggered widespread public outrage, legal scrutiny and demands for the resignation of the Education Minister. The fallout has been immense. More than 20 lakh aspirants preparing for admission to medical colleges have been forced to undergo another cycle of preparation and uncertainty. At least five aspirants died by suicide. The controversy has also intensified scrutiny of the NTA, which has repeatedly shaken the faith of the students in the country’s examination system.
The Peek Insight: The lockdown of question paper setters and the deployment of military-grade logistical support may reduce the risk of another leak, but they also underscore the depth of the institutional crisis confronting India’s examination system. Treating a national entrance examination as a high-security operation can help contain an immediate threat; it cannot, by itself, repair the structural weaknesses that enabled the breach in the first place. The central concern is not whether the June 21 retest will be secure, but why such extraordinary measures have become necessary. The alleged involvement of individuals entrusted with safeguarding the examination process points to failures of oversight, vetting, and accountability within the system itself. When insiders become the source of compromise, the problem extends beyond security infrastructure and enters the realm of institutional governance. Perhaps the most troubling aspect remains the imbalance in accountability. Students have borne the consequences through prolonged uncertainty, renewed preparation, and emotional strain, but the government simply refuses to give in to the demands of fixing accountability right at the top.
US Court Cuts The Cost Of Chasing The American Dream
The Fact: A federal court in US’ Boston has struck down the Trump administration’s controversial $100,000 fee on new H-1B visas, delivering a major relief to thousands of skilled foreign workers, especially Indians who form the backbone of the programme. On June 8, U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin ruled that the fee, imposed through a presidential proclamation in September 2025, amounted to an unlawful tax because it had not been authorised by the U.S. Congress. The fee had sharply reduced applications, with U.S. authorities recording only 85 payments of the $100,000 charge between its implementation and mid-February. The ruling came after a legal challenge by 20 Democratic-led states, which argued that the policy undermined the ability of employers, universities, and healthcare institutions to recruit highly skilled talent.
The Context: The H-1B visa programme allows American companies to hire highly skilled foreign professionals in sectors such as information technology, engineering, medicine, finance, biotechnology, and academic research. The programme is capped at 65,000 visas annually, with an additional 20,000 visas reserved for individuals holding advanced U.S. degrees. Before the Trump administration’s fee hike, the cost of obtaining an H-1B visa generally ranged from $2,000 to $5,000, depending on filing requirements and employer obligations. For India, the programme is particularly significant. According to data cited by the Pew Research Center, Indians accounted for 73% of all approved H-1B workers in fiscal year 2023, continuing a trend in which a majority of approvals have gone to Indian-born professionals every year since 2010. China was a distant second at 12%.
The Peek Insight: The court’s decision restores a measure of certainty to a system that had been thrown into turmoil by a sudden and unprecedented increase in visa costs. From an Indian perspective, the ruling is more than a legal setback for the Trump administration; it is recognition of the economic reality that the United States remains heavily dependent on global talent, particularly from India. American technology firms, research institutions, and healthcare systems have long relied on highly skilled Indian professionals to fill specialised roles that are often difficult to staff domestically. However, the relief may prove temporary. The Trump administration has indicated it is likely to appeal the ruling, and its broader push to tighten skilled immigration remains intact. That uncertainty means prospective applicants and employers will continue to monitor policy developments closely.
Image Courtesy: The Times Of India
Aam vs Aam Aadmi: If Japan And Nepal Won’t Eat It, Should You?
Image Courtesy: ANI
The Fact: Nepal has banned the import of Indian mangoes after inspectors found pesticide residue levels above permitted limits in imported consignments. The restriction has been in place since April-May, with Nepali authorities saying it will also encourage the consumption of locally grown fruit. This comes after Japan also banned the import of mangoes produced in India for the first time in 20 years. The ban was imposed after Japanese authorities found lapses in the pest control procedures at certain Indian mango production facilities.
The Context: The mango controversy is part of a broader debate around food safety and quality control in India. In 2024, concerns over pesticide residues led authorities in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Nepal to scrutinise or restrict certain India-manufactured spices, including those manufactured by MDH and Everest. Similar concerns have also been flagged by European regulators regarding some Indian agricultural exports. Domestically, reports of food adulteration have repeatedly surfaced, ranging from fake dairy products and sweets to counterfeit packaged goods. While regulatory agencies such as the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) conduct inspections and enforcement drives, critics argue that weak monitoring and inconsistent implementation continue to allow unsafe, and at times toxic products, to reach consumers.
The Peek Insight: Nepal's ban, coupled with Japan's restrictions on Indian mango exports, highlights growing international scrutiny of India's food safety standards. The larger challenge for India is not just protecting exports but maintaining consumer confidence at home as well. As global markets tighten quality requirements and domestic consumers become more aware of food safety issues, regulatory credibility becomes increasingly important. The debate is about whether India's food safety system can consistently ensure that what reaches consumers is safe and trustworthy. Over the last few months, everything from fake paneer, fake ENO, fake Sensodyne, fake Maggi, adulterated ghee, and sweets has been caught in India. And the body that’s responsible for making sure such products don’t enter our markets, the FSSAI, has simply failed to shut these fake food businesses, so the impractical solution they offer is that you, consumers, should check what you eat. The question is, how do these fake food mafia gangs bypass regulatory norms imposed by authorities and enter the market?
And finally,
Indian news needs a new mainstream
We’ve all seen it enough: TV debates chasing noise, newspapers weighed down with complexity, and social media flooded with misinformation. But none of that means you should be left confused, misled, or disconnected from the truth.
Join us in building a space where clarity cuts through chaos, and the truth comes above all numbers!